Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 4102 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-2675QM - 193 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-2675QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
