Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 932 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 45 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-2670QM - 145 vs 144 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2670QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2670QM | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
