Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3781 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 13% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-2635QM - 174 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 12 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i7-2635QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
