Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400 outperforms Core i7-2630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400 is 2646 days newer than Core i7-2630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-2630QM - 122 vs 117 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2630QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Pentium Gold G5400
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2630QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
433
59.23392612859097%
Multi-Core
1365
90.75797872340425%
Intel Core i7-2630QM | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
