Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Core i7-2630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3725 days newer than Core i7-2630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-2630QM - 184 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2630QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2630QM | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |