Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 3026 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $235.0 vs $554.05
- Up to 56% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-9900T - $0.94 vs $2.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-2600S - 257 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 16 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
251
97.66536964980544%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2940 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.16/FPS
43.51851851851851%
Price, $
$554.05
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $554.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
40.68387997208654%
Multi-Core
1811
30.21354688021355%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |