Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $235.0 vs $799.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-13400F - $1.3 vs $3.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 34% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-2600S - 243 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 16 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
181
74.48559670781893%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2839 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.29/FPS
39.51367781155015%
Price, $
$799.99
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
25.458515283842797%
Multi-Core
1811
16.85435086086552%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |