Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4378 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Core i7-2600S - 287 vs 256 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - $127.07 vs $235.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-2600S - $0.44 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 60 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
256
89.19860627177701%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
47.826086956521735%
Price, $
$235
54%
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$127.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $127.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
25.876608965823344%
Multi-Core
1811
24.683112988960065%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |