Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2427 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $122.78 vs $384.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-7940X - $1.55 vs $3.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 95 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 44% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-2600 - 114 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600 - 28 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
79
69%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Buy for $384 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |