Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1696 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2600 - 127 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - $100.0 vs $169.68
- Up to 46% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2600 - $0.79 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $169.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |