Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600 is 653 days older than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than FX-8350 - 228 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - $185.0 vs $190.73
- Up to 1% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-2600 - $0.83 vs $0.84 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3357 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |