Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 1840 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 136 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 28 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $189.95 vs $399.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-14700K - $1.81 vs $2.94 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.94/FPS
61%
Price, $
$399.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
105
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $189.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 12 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |