Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900F - 159 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 28 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $225.0 vs $369.57
- Up to 29% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-14700F - $1.65 vs $2.32 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
71%
Price, $
$369.57
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13348 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
85%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |