Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 38% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3240T - 209 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $25.7 vs $369.57
- Up to 90% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700F - $0.17 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $369.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
151
72%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |