Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 53% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 263 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$696.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $696.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |