Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G3930 - 248 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $63.92 vs $313.71
- Up to 76% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i7-13700K - $0.3 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
23%
Price, $
$313.71
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $313.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
215
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |