Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-13700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900 is 369 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-13700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-13700F - 583 vs 541 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $554.99 vs $1399.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-13700F - $0.95 vs $2.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15399 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
583
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$554.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $554.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |