Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-9600K - 151 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $145.0 vs $1399.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-13700F - $1.07 vs $9.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.27/FPS
11%
Price, $
$1399.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12953 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12954 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |