Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4150 - 130 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $45.0 vs $1399.99
- Up to 96% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700F - $0.45 vs $10.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.77/FPS
4%
Price, $
$1399.99
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13570 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13572 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |