Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240T - 215 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $25.7 vs $316.71
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $316.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76959 minutes ago
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
16.798196166854567%
Multi-Core
971
6.274636510500809%
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |