Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 58% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 254 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $68.02 vs $1399.99
- Up to 92% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-13700F - $0.42 vs $5.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14251 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
63%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |