Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 2986 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 35% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 203 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$224.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $224.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 80 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |