Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7500T - 199 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $69.0 vs $249.99
- Up to 67% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-12700F - $0.41 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
32%
Price, $
$249.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18610 minutes ago
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18611 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |