Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i3-4150 - 206 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $45.0 vs $249.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Control than Core i7-12700F - $0.22 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
18%
Price, $
$249.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |