Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 2809 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 18% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 263 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11800H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 80 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
