Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Core i3-550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3943 days newer than Core i3-550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-550 - 192 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-550 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-550 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$201.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $201.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i3-550 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |