Buy on Amazon
$549.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 2193 days newer than Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 36% better in Diablo IV than Core i7-5930K - 225 vs 165 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1165G7 - 12 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-5930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
165
73%
Value, $/FPS
$3.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$549.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-5930K Processor 3.5GHz 0GT/s 15MB LGA 2011-v3 CPU Only, BX80648I75930K
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-1165G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Core i7-5930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-1165G7 or Core i7-5930K
Diablo IV, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
1 FPS
$1599.99/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Core i7-1165G7
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,599.99
In Stock
1 FPS
$899/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i7-1165G7
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
