Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i7-10875H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 103 days newer than Core i7-10875H.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 45 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i7-10875H - 280 vs 277 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10875H - 64 vs 16 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $2,440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10875H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |