Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-9400F - 405 vs 360 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $101.79 vs $206.42
- Up to 45% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.28 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
405
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
54%
Price, $
$206.42
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $206.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
360
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$101.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |