Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 938 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-8400 - 137 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $130.73 vs $209.65
- Up to 34% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700KF - $1.01 vs $1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
66%
Price, $
$209.65
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
130
94%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |