Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G550 - 275 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $49.0 vs $208.99
- Up to 72% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-10700KF - $0.21 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
27%
Price, $
$208.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8234 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |