Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1820 - 112 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $46.41 vs $208.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.51 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
27%
Price, $
$208.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8959 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
91
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8959 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |