Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 180 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $214.99 vs $270.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.19 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |