Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3240T - 172 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $25.7 vs $230.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-10700K - $0.17 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6875 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6875 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |