Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1734 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i7-6700K - 153 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $180.0 vs $225.94
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-10700F - $1.18 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
79%
Price, $
$225.94
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |