Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7600K - 135 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $190.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 14% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700F - $1.43 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
85%
Price, $
$225.99
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11828 minutes ago
Buy for $190 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11828 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |