Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4570T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-4570T - 272 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $70.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 67% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-10700F - $0.27 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
32%
Price, $
$225.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13317 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-4570T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |