Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2252 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-4460T - 208 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $52.87 vs $225.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-10700F - $0.27 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
24%
Price, $
$225.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5481 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
195
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5480 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |