Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i5-L16G7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 57 days older than Core i5-L16G7.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 7 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 26% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-L16G7 - 584 vs 462 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-L16G7 - 16 vs 5 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
584
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2050 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 26th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lakefield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
5 | Cores | 8 |
5 | Threads | 16 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
7 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |