Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 130 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 110 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $180.12 vs $1075.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $1.64 vs $10.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 32 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$180.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $180.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3802 minutes ago
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3802 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |