Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - 137 vs 115 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $112.02 vs $145.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9600K - $0.97 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11723 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11723 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |