Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $195.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-13900F - $1.23 vs $2.6 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-9600 - 167 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600 - 32 vs 6 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8005 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |