Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9800X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 81 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than Core i7-9800X - 703 vs 700 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $80.0 vs $768.88
- Up to 90% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-9800X - $0.11 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
703
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
700
99.57325746799431%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
10%
Price, $
$768.88
10%
Buy for $768.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-9800X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |