Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 129 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in War Thunder than Core i3-9100T - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $80.0 vs $99.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-9100T - $0.48 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
168
94.3820224719101%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
81.35593220338984%
Price, $
$99
80%
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
87.30043541364296%
Multi-Core
3178
65.74265618535374%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |