Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 1956 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than FX-9590 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than FX-9590 - $126.93 vs $298.02
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $126.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |