Buy on Amazon
$148.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-8600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2286 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-8600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8600K - 212 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - $100.99 vs $148.49
- Up to 38% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-8600K - $0.48 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 8 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i5-8600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Unlocked LGA 1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $148.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4992 minutes ago
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-14100F Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
