Buy on Amazon
$125
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8500T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8500T is 2240 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8500T
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - 119 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $125.0 vs $151.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - $1.05 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8500T - 8 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-8500T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel CM8068403362509 Core i5-8500T Prcsr Tray
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3027 minutes ago
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
112
94.11764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
77.77777777777779%
Price, $
$151
82%
CM8061901049606 Core i7 i7-3820 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA-2011
Buy for $151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3022 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-8500T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
52.243861134631665%
Multi-Core
2299
55.841632256497455%
Intel Core i5-8500T | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
