Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1738 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $139.0 vs $292.32
- Up to 51% better value when playing Control than Core i7-13700F - $0.69 vs $1.41 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i5-8400T - 207 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 24 vs 6 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
201
97.10144927536231%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6672 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
48.93617021276596%
Price, $
$292.32
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $292.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6678 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
41.30026305900037%
Multi-Core
3884
25.098546042003235%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |