Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $130.73 vs $696.98
- Up to 79% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-13700K - $0.49 vs $2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-8400 - 301 vs 265 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
265
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2543 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
301
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
21%
Price, $
$696.98
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $696.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |