Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 1039 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Core i5-10400F - 817 vs 779 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - $99.95 vs $188.88
- Up to 43% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-7640X - $0.13 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 65 vs 112 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 12 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
817
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
56%
Price, $
$188.88
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 797 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
779
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
112 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |